Behavioural finance tells us that herd behaviour is hard wired into our brains. As investors we don’t want to miss out on opportunities, especially when we see others taking advantage of them. Herd behaviour and a fear of missing out is what drives asset bubbles, which means as investors we need to be on guard to ensure our emotions take a back seat when we make buy and sell decisions.

Investors are familiar with the FAANG stocks (for the uninitiated FAANG stands for Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Netflix and Google). Some of them are among the highest valued stocks in the world (Apple became the first company in the world to reach a market cap of $1 trillion but has since fallen below this level due to falling iPhone sales). In Australia we have our own acronymised technology cohort called the WAAAX stocks, which include WiseTech, Altium, Appen, Afterpay and Xero.

While hardly on par with the US tech giants in terms of size, these businesses have managed to capture people’s attention and imagination in a similar way. But like the FAANGs, the WAAAXs are certainly not a homogenous group. While each has seen eyewatering growth in recent years, they are essentially very different businesses with different growth drivers and risks.

WAAAXing fortunes

It’s sometimes easy to forget how parochial the Australian share market can be. The WAAAX phenomenon is undoubtedly a good thing, especially given that the ASX remains dominated by banks and miners. Australia’s tech sector may still be small, but its growth is helping to provide some much-needed diversification. While only 2.4% of the ASX 200’s total market cap, there are now 15 names in the tech sector with a combined market cap of over $75 billion.

WAAAX share price returns (12 months to end March 2019)

Source: FE, Lonsec

When you look at the stellar growth of these shares, it’s easy to see why they’re considered the Australian FAANGs. But how useful is it to group shares together in this way? Certainly in the US, the FAANGs don’t always behave as a group. While the return of risk appetite contributed to their strong performance in the March quarter, most were unable to make up for earlier losses due to the ongoing impact of idiosyncratic issues plaguing each stock.

Facebook continues to be scrutinised for their lax privacy policies, Amazon is facing a challenging earnings outlook, Apple’s revenue and product launches have fallen short of expectations, Netflix faces increasing pressure from new competitors, and Alphabet (Google) received another fine from the European Union for violating antitrust laws.

In Australia, the diversity of the WAAAX stocks poses a similar challenge for investors. To give a sense of how different these businesses are, let’s have a quick look at two of them: Appen and Afterpay. These are among the most popular shares over the past two years, but they have fundamentally different core businesses. For Appen, revenue is driven by the growth in AI and machine learning solutions, with Appen providing quality datasets that help make these products smarter. In contrast, Afterpay’s extraordinary growth has been due to the company’s ability to take advantage of a potential step change in consumer behaviour, with a younger generation of consumers favouring digital payments and more flexible spending.

Source: Lonsec

While these stocks are different, there is no denying the extraordinary growth of the WAAAX group, which is indicative of some of the disruptive trends taking place in the digital world. This is reflected in the sales and EBITDA growth of Afterpay and Appen, which becomes starker when compared to other popular sector peers Seek and Carsales. Clearly there are good reasons to be optimistic, but the question is how best to take advantage of these opportunities in your broader portfolio.

Source: FE, Lonsec

Using WAAAX shares in your portfolio – key things to note

When incorporating the WAAAX shares in your portfolio, the most important thing to remember is that they are not homogenous, which means you shouldn’t group them together. While these shares may grow together in a risk on environment, each face their own set of risks and opportunities which could see results diverge significantly.

The second thing to note is that these are capital hungry businesses with a mandate to grow, which means you should not expect a steady stream of hefty dividends. Because they are long duration assets, they will also be more sensitive to movements in interest rates.

Thirdly, while each of these stocks appears to enjoy significant upside, there are always risks around valuation and potential bubble-like behaviour. Valuing things like network effects can be difficult, while forecasting consumer trends and the role of AI require a host of assumptions to hold true. When it comes to technology, there is usually a significant degree of uncertainty involved, not to mention the regulatory risks faced by successful disruptors.

Our view of the WAAAX stocks is that you want to take advantage of the growth opportunities they represent, but don’t fall into the trap of bucketing them together. Understand the drivers of each business and let the winners run, but be sure to carefully monitor the market and regulatory risks of each business.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: This document is published by Lonsec Research Pty Ltd ABN 11 151 658 561, AFSL 421 445 (Lonsec).

Please read the following before making any investment decision about any financial product mentioned in this document.

Warnings: Lonsec reserves the right to withdraw this document at any time and assumes no obligation to update this document after the date of publication. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. Any express or implied recommendation, rating, or advice presented in this document is a “class service” (as defined in the Financial Advisers Act 2008 (NZ)) or limited to “general advice” (as defined in the Corporations Act (C’th)) and based solely on consideration of data or the investment merits of the financial product(s) alone, without taking into account the investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs (“financial circumstances”) of any particular person.

Warnings and Disclosure in relation to particular products: If our general advice relates to the acquisition or possible acquisition or disposal or possible disposal of particular classes of assets or financial product(s), before making any decision the reader should obtain and consider more information, including the Investment Statement or Product Disclosure Statement and, where relevant, refer to Lonsec’s full research report for each financial product, including the disclosure notice. The reader must also consider whether it is personally appropriate in light of his or her financial circumstances or should seek further advice on its appropriateness. It is not a “personalised service” (as defined in the Financial Advisers Act 2008 (NZ)) and does not constitute a recommendation to purchase, hold, redeem or sell any financial product(s), and the reader should seek independent financial advice before investing in any financial product. Lonsec may receive a fee from Fund Manager or Product Issuer (s) for reviewing and rating individual financial product(s), using comprehensive and objective criteria. Lonsec may also receive fees from the Fund Manager or Financial Product Issuer (s) for subscribing to investment research content and services provided by Lonsec.

Disclaimer: This document is for the exclusive use of the person to whom it is provided by Lonsec and must not be used or relied upon by any other person. No representation, warranty or undertaking is given or made in relation to the accuracy or completeness of the information presented in this document, which is drawn from public information not verified by Lonsec. Conclusions, ratings and advice are reasonably held at the time of completion but subject to change without notice. Lonsec assumes no obligation to update this document following publication. Except for any liability which cannot be excluded, Lonsec, its directors, officers, employees and agents disclaim all liability for any error, inaccuracy, misstatement or omission, or any loss suffered through relying on the information.

Copyright © 2019 Lonsec Research Pty Ltd, ABN 11 151 658 561, AFSL 421 445. All rights reserved. Read our Privacy Policy here.

When you ask clients how they think about risk in retirement, you are unlikely to get a textbook response. Instead, you’ll probably get a list of their deepest fears: running out of money, leaving their children with nothing, living too long, retiring during the next GFC, or not having enough cash on hand to pay for necessities.

When we define investment risks, we don’t define them in these terms, but these are the eventualities we’re attempting to guard against when we construct retirement portfolios. There are any number of objectives your client might be aiming to achieve, and each will come with their own set of risks.

Is it the chance of your investments going down? Is it asset class volatility? Is it not achieving the returns you need to meet your required income? In the end, risk is getting your investment strategy wrong by not understanding the relationship between your client’s competing objectives and associated risks.

For this reason, we believe there is a need to focus on retirement investing as a separate strategy. Even moving from the accumulation to the drawdown phase means you are managing a different set of trade-offs. The role of the financial adviser is not to eliminate the existence of these trade-offs but to manage them prudently in line with their client’s preferences and risk tolerance.

Source: Lonsec

Each of these competing objectives requires different investment strategies to achieve. For example, a rental property will provide the most consistent income but at the expense of liquidity. If we’re worried about market volatility we might be tempted to move to a more defensive asset allocation, but by foregoing growth we increase the chance of running out of money. In short, clients will always be exposed to various types of risk.

The problem with determining a client’s most important objectives is that often they are all equally important. Consider the following examples:

Paying the bills

Certainty of income is usually the key concern for retirees, but don’t discount the others. When you ask advice clients what their most important objectives are, the most common answers are things like relaxation, travel, family, and leisure. These all have a price associated with them. Liquidity is also a major consideration for retirees. Not having enough cash on hand for things like motor vehicle repairs and other essential spending can result in significant stress and prevent retirees from enjoying the things they were looking forward to after their working life.

Leaving a legacy

Most people wish to enjoy a comfortable life in retirement but also make sure their children and loved ones are left with some extra wealth. A 2017 ASFA study found that households are retiring with an average super balance of $337,000 (the gender breakdown is $270,000 for men and $157,000 for women). Leaving a meaningful inheritance or bequest would mean there is barely enough left over to support their own needs.

Maintaining purchasing power

As any basic economic textbook will tell you, different asset classes will perform better or worse in different inflationary environments. Inflation of 2% per year will erode more than half of your purchasing power over 35 years, which is the equivalent of a single GFC event. Managing inflation is just as important as managing sequencing risk or the risk of a large drawdown, even in periods where inflation is relatively low.

This adds an additional consideration to the construction of retirement portfolios. Real assets are a proven way of managing inflation risk, while fixed income is potentially the worst asset class for this purpose, with the exception of products like inflation-linked bonds.

Different assets perform differently depending on the inflationary environment

Source: Lonsec

Guarding against a crisis

If successfully timing the market seems more like luck than skill, then timing your retirement is no different. While market bumps are nothing to be feared when you’re building your wealth, a sudden major event like the GFC can spell disaster for those entering the decumulation phase. Sequencing risk refers to the order in which investors experience returns, and it can matter a great deal for retirement. Withdrawals during a falling market have the potential to accelerate the depletion of your asset base.

To see how this works, take a look at the returns from Lonsec’s balanced portfolio over the last 20 years. If you reverse the order of returns, there isn’t really much difference for those in the accumulation phase – both sequences deliver the exact same results over the long term. But for those drawing down on their investments, the reversed sequence results in the retiree running out of money much sooner.

The sequence of returns can mean the difference between having enough cash and running out

Source: Lonsec

Addressing sequencing risk requires advisers to look at a wider range of solutions, including variable beta or absolute return strategies, and even some more illiquid options to reduce volatility and manage drawdowns. Once again, there is a trade-off involved in making these decisions.

The reason we struggle to precisely define risk is that there simply isn’t a single source of risk that can be effectively managed or reduced to zero. Managing risk means understanding the often complex relationships between different retirement objectives. Effectively managing these relationships is the purpose of your investment strategy.

When we talk about risk at Lonsec in a portfolio context, what we are really talking about is the risk that the overall investment strategy is wrong or is not properly tailored to the client’s needs and preferences. This informs the approach we take to the management of our model portfolios as well as the selection of individual products to achieve a particular objective. We think this is the proper way to think about risk without being constrained by a single textbook definition, and it is the way in which advice clients intuitively understand risk as well.

Last week, we partnered with Money Management to recognise the best performing funds at the annual Money Management and Lonsec Fund Manager of the Year Awards Dinner. A full list of winners can be found below.

Congratulations to all of our award winners and nominees!

Category Winner
Australian Large Cap Equities AB Managed Volatility Equities Fund
Australian Small Cap Equities Perennial Value Microcap Opportunities Trust
Global Equities Generation Wholesale Global Share Fund
Global Emerging Market Equities Fidelity China Fund
Long/Short Equities Solaris Australian Equity Long Short Fund
Responsible Investments Australian Ethical Australian Shares Fund (Wholesale)
Australian Property Securities Pendal Property Securities Fund
Global Property Securities Quay Global Real Estate Fund
Infrastructure Securities Magellan Infrastructure Fund
Direct Property Australian Unity Retail Property Fund
Australian Fixed Income Janus Henderson Australian Fixed Interest Fund
Global Fixed Income Colchester Global Government Bond Fund Class I
Alternative Strategies Partners Group Global Value Fund (AUD) – Wholesale
Multi-Asset BMO Pyrford Global Absolute Return
ETF Provider Van Eck
SMA Provider AB Concentrated Global Growth Equities Portfolio
Listed Products (LICs & LITs) Australian Foundation Investment Company Limited
Retirement and Income Focussed Legg Mason Martin Currie Real Income Fund
Emerging Manager Lennox Australian Small Companies Fund
Fund Manager of the Year AllianceBernstein

Leading research house and managed account provider Lonsec will work with financial advisers seeking to transition from conflicted advice models and introduce a greater degree of independence in their investment decisions.

Lonsec is offering to acquire in-house managed portfolios from advice licensees to enable them to take advantage of best practice governance principles and Lonsec’s experienced team of portfolio construction experts.

With a shift currently taking place in the advice industry in the wake of the Royal Commission into Financial Services, Lonsec said advisers are acutely aware of the need to present a professional, conflict-free advice environment for their clients.

“Advice models have come under a great deal of scrutiny by the Royal Commission as well as the regulators and the community,” said Lonsec CEO Charlie Haynes.

“The Royal Commission may have stopped short of a ban on vertically integrated or conflicted financial advice, but advisers know they need to start moving quickly in this direction to meet community expectations.”

While it is becoming increasingly unpalatable for licensees or advisers to charge portfolio management fees for in-house managed accounts, advisers are also cognisant of regulatory developments.

An empowered ASIC is investigating how platform providers ensure the integrity of managed accounts constructed by advice licensees who might lack the expertise or resources to act as specialist investment managers.

For many advisers, the question is how best to manage conflicts, either by outsourcing the portfolio construction process or introducing a greater degree of independence in their investment decisions.

Lonsec is proposing to acquire the investment management rights from existing managed account providers, enabling them to focus on the provision of advice without conflict.

Licensees have the flexibility to retain their existing branding, investment mandate and platform, or transition to Lonsec’s own professionally managed portfolios incorporating best ideas and insights from Australia’s leading investment product research house.

“An outsourced managed account solution is becoming increasingly popular, not just in order to reduce conflicts but to allow advisers to focus on their clients’ needs and aspirations while leaving the investment process to specialised portfolio managers,” said Mr Haynes.

With Australia’s economic expansion under threat, house prices falling, and a wave of people set to retire over the next decade, financial advisers are under pressure to provide advice and solutions that can withstand Australia’s future retirement challenges.

Lonsec’s Retire program addresses the growing need for the financial services industry to work together to come up with those solutions and strategies.

Lonsec has been running its successful Retire program for more than five years, and it continues to go from strength to strength. The schedule of content and events planned for the next 12 months is the largest yet, with nine Retire Partners now on board to deliver in-depth retirement insights, including:                          

Alliance Bernstein Fidelity      Legg Mason
Allianz Retire+  Invesco  Pendal
Challenger Investors Mutual  Talaria

Lonsec’s Retire Partners will be providing a wealth of content to help advisers understand and deal with a range of issues faced by advisers and their clients.

The program will really kick off on May 7th with the major Lonsec Symposium event at the Westin, Sydney. With more than 600 advisers and wealth managers already registered, along with an impressive line-up of high-profile speakers and industry leaders, this is a must-attend event for all retirement professionals.

Mention the property market to Australian investors and the first thing they probably think of is the collapse in residential property values. These price falls are the result of a number of factors, some of which have also negatively affected Australian listed property (or A-REITs), while themes such as low wages growth and higher household indebtedness have had a significant impact on retail businesses and their landlords. The rise of online juggernauts like Amazon have further added to the pressure. But despite the challenges, listed property has held up remarkably well as a diversified source of income and capital growth.

The S&P/ASX 300 A-REIT index overall has delivered an impressive 26% return over the year to March, outperforming local and global shares. With retail assets representing almost 46% of the index, the underperformance of this sector is certainly more pronounced. With retail sales growth currently around 3.0% per annum—well below peak years over the last decade of over 5.6% and the average 3.6%—this is translating into weaker rental growth and higher capital expenditure to improve patronage at shopping centres. In general, the super-regional centres will continue to adapt well and neighbourhood (food-based) centres are also reasonably placed, while it is the smaller shopping centres and retail strips that are most vulnerable.

But while retail has struggled, other sectors have stepped up. Leading the way in terms of A-REIT earnings has been the diversified and industrial REITs, particularly those with funds management businesses. Charter Hall Group (+38% for the March quarter) and Amazon’s landlord Goodman Group (+26%) came out on top following similar gains over calendar year 2018. Lonsec notes that the elevated earnings of funds management (boosted by performance fees from cyclical high returns) and development activities can disappear when the cycle turns, as can the premium ratings for such stocks.

Nevertheless, Australian commercial property is being underpinned by a growing economy and infrastructure spending is benefiting the Sydney office sector in particular. Income growth of around 5.0% is expected for FY19, however the outlook is for some easing in rental growth (Sydney and Melbourne) with signs of recovery in Brisbane and Perth. Capitalisation rates are now at or below previous cyclical troughs (pricing peaks) and the next supply wave is 18–24 months away (new space predominantly pre-committed).

A-REITs versus shares (growth of $10,000 over five years)

Source: Financial Express, Lonsec

Even those A-REITs with residential exposure are still expecting a better second half of FY19 from previous sales coming through. However, the market is expecting a 10–20% fall in FY20 sales given the soft secondary residential price market, tighter lending, and potential changes to negative gearing for investors should the Labor Party win government at the 18 May federal election.

Nonetheless, Australia remains attractive for international and local investors, with one of the highest REIT market dividend yields of 4.7% and a +2.9% spread to 10-year bonds. The Australian dollar has been relatively steady during the March quarter. Given the recent in rise in A-REIT prices, valuations overall for the sector are around a 10% premium to NAV3 (although the pricing between sectors has retail/residential at a discount and office/industrial at a premium).

A-REIT member price gains (12 months to 31 March 2019)

Source: Bloomberg, Lonsec

Turning to the overseas market and Lonsec has observed some similar themes, but the macro setting has had a major influence, with bond rates continuing to soften in the March quarter and expectations of interest rate rises pushed back. As China-US trade war tensions eased, listed markets recovered from the December quarter pullback and more than made up for the negative returns of calendar year 2018. The discount that listed property markets were trading at has now dissipated and the sector is trading more in line with private market valuations.

The fundamentals in developed property markets remain much the same, with demand from tenants in retail assets the weakest and major retailers sporadically trimming outlet numbers or completely closing down. Investment performance from retail shares continues to lag, especially the industrial and logistics sector, which is attracting investment to improve the supply lines on the back of expanding online channels.

It is yet to be seen whether counter-cyclical investors that are chipping away at the deep value offered by retail property shares (especially the higher quality ones) will reap the benefits of an eventual normalising of relative values. Some fund managers believe there has been a permanent shift in investor valuations towards the industrial/logistics property sector. Lonsec is still of the view that global property markets are in the mature part of the cycle, although the tail end is being extended while inflation and interest rate pressures are kept at bay.

Some investors baulk at the thought of investing in listed property in an environment of rising interest rates, a softening residential housing market, and the rise of competition from the online world. While listed property is traditionally a defensive asset class with a negative correlation to bond yields, the sector has shown it is able to deliver in this environment, and the asset class has remained critical to investor portfolios as a means of achieving diversification and reliable income streams. While some sectors have certainly come under pressure, as a whole listed property has been a truly understated performer.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: This document is published by Lonsec Research Pty Ltd ABN 11 151 658 561, AFSL 421 445 (Lonsec).

Please read the following before making any investment decision about any financial product mentioned in this document.

Warnings: Lonsec reserves the right to withdraw this document at any time and assumes no obligation to update this document after the date of publication. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. Any express or implied recommendation, rating, or advice presented in this document is a “class service” (as defined in the Financial Advisers Act 2008 (NZ)) or limited to “general advice” (as defined in the Corporations Act (C’th)) and based solely on consideration of data or the investment merits of the financial product(s) alone, without taking into account the investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs (“financial circumstances”) of any particular person.

Warnings and Disclosure in relation to particular products: If our general advice relates to the acquisition or possible acquisition or disposal or possible disposal of particular classes of assets or financial product(s), before making any decision the reader should obtain and consider more information, including the Investment Statement or Product Disclosure Statement and, where relevant, refer to Lonsec’s full research report for each financial product, including the disclosure notice. The reader must also consider whether it is personally appropriate in light of his or her financial circumstances or should seek further advice on its appropriateness. It is not a “personalised service” (as defined in the Financial Advisers Act 2008 (NZ)) and does not constitute a recommendation to purchase, hold, redeem or sell any financial product(s), and the reader should seek independent financial advice before investing in any financial product. Lonsec may receive a fee from Fund Manager or Product Issuer (s) for reviewing and rating individual financial product(s), using comprehensive and objective criteria. Lonsec may also receive fees from the Fund Manager or Financial Product Issuer (s) for subscribing to investment research content and services provided by Lonsec.

Disclaimer: This document is for the exclusive use of the person to whom it is provided by Lonsec and must not be used or relied upon by any other person. No representation, warranty or undertaking is given or made in relation to the accuracy or completeness of the information presented in this document, which is drawn from public information not verified by Lonsec. Conclusions, ratings and advice are reasonably held at the time of completion but subject to change without notice. Lonsec assumes no obligation to update this document following publication. Except for any liability which cannot be excluded, Lonsec, its directors, officers, employees and agents disclaim all liability for any error, inaccuracy, misstatement or omission, or any loss suffered through relying on the information.

Copyright © 2019 Lonsec Research Pty Ltd, ABN 11 151 658 561, AFSL 421 445. All rights reserved. Read our Privacy Policy here.

The Fed may have put its tightening plans on ice, but the yield curve is signalling that all may not be well in financial markets.
This article is intended for licensed financial advisers only and is not intended for use by retail investors.

The Fed may have put its tightening plans on ice, but the yield curve is signalling that all may not be well in financial markets. Yields on US government bonds have been moving lower since December 2018, when the Fed responded to market concerns by moving to a ‘neutral’ stance, thereby delaying further tightening. But the rate at which longer-term yields have fallen in response has ended up fulfilling the market’s fear of a yield curve inversion, which is traditionally a predictor of an economic recession—and a fall in equity markets.

Fears of a flattening or inverting yield curve cropped up about a year ago in March 2018, but back then yields were on the way up, with expectations of future Fed tightening and a gradual rise in inflation prompting investors to reassess long-term interest rates. While the 10-year yield moved higher, shorter-term rates also rose in line with the Fed’s tightening path, producing a very flat looking yield curve. The situation now is a bit different—the yield curve did indeed invert in April this year, at least across the 3-month to 10-year portion of the curve, but remains upward sloping beyond that range. Compare this to the shape of the yield curve during the previous tightening phase (way back in 2004) and things certainly look different this time around.

Inverted vs flat vs ‘normal’

Source: US Treasury, Lonsec

Is the yield curve still relevant?

If you went to university before the global financial crisis, you would have been taught that a yield curve with a positive slope is a sign of a healthy economy and healthy markets, and traditionally this has certainly been the case—a steepening yield curve generally means investors expect rising inflation and stronger economic growth. In contrast a flat or inverted yield curve means short-term inflation expectations have accelerated relative to longer-term expectations, pointing to low growth and a heightened risk of recession.

Today, things are not quite so straightforward. With the advent of quantitative easing and record low interest rates, as well as structural transformations taking place within economies, the power of the yield curve as a predictor of doom has been brought into question. In fact, some argue there is a risk in overreacting to what could possibly be a false signal. In the world of statistics there are two broad errors humans can make, known as Type I and Type II errors. We risk making a Type I error if we believe the recession signal to be true when it is in fact false. On the other hand, if we assume everything is fine and that the yield curve can be safely ignored, we risk committing a Type II error if the signal is in fact valid. Unfortunately, the elimination of both types of error is impossible.

The US 10-year yield fell as the Fed gave way to market fears

Source: Bloomberg, Lonsec

The yield curve has been an area of recent focus at the Fed and the academic community, but even among some of the world’s leading economists there is no consensus. The San Francisco Fed contends that an inverted curve continues to be a predictor of recessions (especially the 3-month to 10-year curve), while former Fed chair Janet Yellen among others believes that, given abnormally low cash rates, this time it’s different. Inverted yield curves have occurred on only eight occasions since 1958. The US economy has slipped into a recession within two years of an inverted yield curve more than two-thirds of the time. While this is a well-known phenomenon, investors have always debated whether an inverted yield curve is truly reflective of fundamentals or whether it is nothing more than a spurious correlation (although possibly one with the power to create a self-fulfilling prophesy).

April’s inversion contributed to a rally in bonds, although this proved short-lived as the curve quickly moved back into positive territory. Markets subsequently priced in a full Fed cut by the end of 2019 and a second cut by the end of 2020. It might be tempting to gloss over the yield curve in this situation, especially while other indicators of market health—like credit spreads and balance sheet quality—are pointing to a relatively benign outlook. But the empirical power of the yield curve does have historical validity, and while there are plenty of theories about why this time is different, these theories are untested because there are no other periods that can emulate the extraordinary nature of monetary policy in the decade following the GFC.

Very low or negative spreads can signal a fall in equities

Source: Bloomberg, Lonsec

One measure of the yield curve is the spread between 2-year and 10-year Treasury yields. Historically, when this spread has been very low or negative, an economic slowdown and a downturn in equities has followed within 18 to 24 months. As the chart above shows, a negative spread has proved a reliable indicator of economic as well as equities downturns in recent times. For those arguing that the yield curve is now less relevant than it has been in the past, the onus lies on them to explain why this relationship has broken down. Of course, only time will tell if things really are different this time around.

This article has been prepared for licensed financial advisers only. It is not intended for use by retail clients (as defined in the Corporations Act 2001) or any other persons. This information is directed to and prepared for Australian residents only. This information may constitute general advice. It has been prepared without taking account of an investor’s objectives, financial situation or needs and because of that an investor should, before acting on the advice, consider the appropriateness of the advice having regard to their personal objectives, financial situation and needs.

It’s been an interesting period for risk assets over the past six months. The last quarter of 2018 saw markets retract as sentiment shifted away from risk assets, driven by fears of further rate rises in the US and a pullback in global growth. Roll forward to the March quarter of 2019 and it has been risk on for equities, with both Australian and global markets posting double-digit returns for the quarter.

The key catalyst for the reversal in trend was the US Federal Reserve’s announcement that they plan to keep rates on hold until further notice. Interest rate markets adjusted their expectations, implying that rates may even drop by the end of 2020. It highlights the significant influence the Fed has on market sentiment despite market fundamentals not materially changing.

For some time we have been communicating that we are in the later stages of the cycle. The latest recovery may well be a late-cycle market rally, but either way the extended tail of the cycle is still wagging. Our medium-term view remains that returns will be lower as markets become increasingly constrained by the late stage of the cycle and tighter liquidity. We also believe that market volatility will increase and that valuation opportunities will present themselves as some markets retract. A good example of this has been emerging market equities, where valuation support has been increasing for the sector following a pullback during 2018.

Based on our internal valuation model we believe that the sector offers value and that the expected returns compensate for the additional risk associated with emerging markets equities over the medium term. Conversely, we have reduced our exposure to Australian equities, noting a softening in company earnings and broader market implications associated with the housing slowdown.

This article has been prepared for licensed financial advisers only. It is not intended for use by retail clients (as defined in the Corporations Act 2001) or any other persons. This information is directed to and prepared for Australian residents only. This information may constitute general advice. It has been prepared without taking account of an investor’s objectives, financial situation or needs and because of that an investor should, before acting on the advice, consider the appropriateness of the advice having regard to their personal objectives, financial situation and needs.

Last night Treasurer Frydenberg handed down his first budget a month before the regular budget season. With the possibility of a May election, this budget is as much a political statement as an economic one, with tax measures to please key voter groups, a further boost to infrastructure spending, and the much-vaunted return to surplus. But the implementation of these measures depends on the re-election of the current government, while the surplus itself remains at the mercy of the economic outlook.

The long-awaited surplus

As expected, the underlying cash balance is forecast to return to a surplus of $7.1 billion in 2019-20, or 0.4% of GDP. Revenue growth is being driven by an improving economy, and a surplus may even be achieved slightly sooner than expected given the rise in commodity prices (especially iron ore) and associated company tax receipts.

Budget aggregates


Source: Budget 2019-20

The Budget also forecasts that the surplus will be maintained through the four-year period. However, these forecast surpluses remain small at less than 1.0% of GDP and are based on a range of assumptions. If the global and domestic economies slow, or if the government is not as frugal as it expects to be, the slim surpluses could easily be eroded.

Commonwealth revenue and expenses (% GDP)


Source: Treasury

Income tax cuts

Another key selling point of this Budget is the income tax cuts, both to low- and middle-income earners and high-income earners. The Low and Middle Income Tax Offset (LMITO) will be more than doubled from $445 to $1,080 for this financial year. From 2022-23, the Government will increase the top threshold of the 19% tax bracket from $41,000 to $45,000 and increase the Low Income Tax Offset (LITO) from $645 to $700.

These measures have promised more than what the opposition proposed and are designed to peel low- and middle-income voters away from Labor. These measures are likely to be passed in parliament with oppposition support given many of the measures align with Labor policies, but it will be interesting to see Labor’s response to match these.

The long-term tax changes will take effect from July 2024 and will see a reduction in the marginal rate from 32.5% to 30% for those earning between $45,001 and $200,000. Tax changes this far out will inevitably be subject to future changes and election bargaining, and will likely not receive Labor’s support given their opposition to tax cuts for wealthier Australians.

Taxation receipts (% GDP)


Source: Treasury

Infrastructure spending boost

Infrastructure spending for the next ten years has been increased from $75 billion to $100 billion, or around 0.4% of GDP. This is a small increment from the already committed infrastructure spending and a lot of the money is scheduled for the outer years. Some of the bigger projects include the $2 billion fast rail from Geelong to Melbourne, the $3.5 billion Western Sydney Rail, the $1.6 billion M1 Extension in NSW, the $1.5 billion North-South Corridor in SA, and the $800 million Gateway Motorway upgrade in QLD.

Economic outlook is still shaky

While the budget has delivered a surplus, it remains at the mercy of the economic outlook. The Government is assuming GDP growth of 2.25% this financial year, and 2.75% for the next two years. It also assumes the unemployment rate will remain at 5.0% until 2020-21 and that wages growth will pick up to 3.25% in 2020-21. While the labour market remains strong and is likely to continue to improve further, the wages growth assumption seems optimistic.

The Budget also forecasts inflation to return to 2.5% in 2020-21. This also seems overly optimistic and will likely be revised down again given that wages growth has been incredibly modest despite a tightening labour market. Australia’s GDP growth also faces a range of external uncertainties, including a slowdown in our biggest trading partner China, a slowdown in Europe, and geopolitical risks including Brexit and China-US trade tensions. Overall the economic outlook remains subdued.

Implications for the Australian dollar, RBA and financial markets

The RBA left the cash rate unchanged at 1.5% at its April meeting, however the easing bias saw the Australian dollar trade lower. In contrast, the Budget failed to move the dollar as markets had anticipated the surplus and there were no surprises in the budget measures. While income tax cuts and infrastructure spending—as well as other spending on education and health—are supportive of the economy, there is little in the Budget to boost productivity or shift the economic fundamentals. This means the RBA will likely remain in wait-and-see mode before deciding on the next rate move.

Australia holds on to its AAA rating

Australian general government net debt has been increasing since 2010 but is forecast to peak at 19.2% of GDP in 2018-19. The expected return to surplus and improvement in our fiscal position had already seen Standard & Poors lift its outlook for Australian sovereign debt from ‘negative’ to ‘stable’ back in September 2018. With few surprises in this Budget, Australia is likely to maintain its coveted AAA rating, along with only a handful of other countries.

At below 20%, its net debt-to-GDP ratio remains in the middle of the pack compared to other AAA-rated economies, while the average for advanced economies is higher at a 70% ratio. Holding onto the AAA rating means the Australian government can continue borrowing at cheaper interest rates (compared to lower-rated peers), with the rating favourably affecting the state and local governments as well as Australia’s banks, which tend to be rated one or a few notches below the sovereign credit rating.

Net government debt in advanced economies (% GDP)


Source: IMF World Economic Outlook Database, October 2018; Bloomberg

This is an election budget containing few surprises. A return to surplus is undoubtedly welcomed, but the forecast surpluses are slim and vulnerable to the economic outlook. This Budget does not change the economic outlook for Australia, meaning the RBA will remain in wait-and-see mode with an easing bias. While the Budget contains many measures to please the electorate, it remains unclear whether they will be implemented, especially the long-term tax changes. With a federal election looming, it will also be interesting to see the response from Labor, which currently leads the government in the opinion polls.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: This document is published by Lonsec Research Pty Ltd ABN 11 151 658 561, AFSL 421 445 (Lonsec).

Please read the following before making any investment decision about any financial product mentioned in this document.

Warnings: Lonsec reserves the right to withdraw this document at any time and assumes no obligation to update this document after the date of publication. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. Any express or implied recommendation, rating, or advice presented in this document is a “class service” (as defined in the Financial Advisers Act 2008 (NZ)) or limited to “general advice” (as defined in the Corporations Act (C’th)) and based solely on consideration of data or the investment merits of the financial product(s) alone, without taking into account the investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs (“financial circumstances”) of any particular person.

Warnings and Disclosure in relation to particular products: If our general advice relates to the acquisition or possible acquisition or disposal or possible disposal of particular classes of assets or financial product(s), before making any decision the reader should obtain and consider more information, including the Investment Statement or Product Disclosure Statement and, where relevant, refer to Lonsec’s full research report for each financial product, including the disclosure notice. The reader must also consider whether it is personally appropriate in light of his or her financial circumstances or should seek further advice on its appropriateness. It is not a “personalised service” (as defined in the Financial Advisers Act 2008 (NZ)) and does not constitute a recommendation to purchase, hold, redeem or sell any financial product(s), and the reader should seek independent financial advice before investing in any financial product. Lonsec may receive a fee from Fund Manager or Product Issuer (s) for reviewing and rating individual financial product(s), using comprehensive and objective criteria. Lonsec may also receive fees from the Fund Manager or Financial Product Issuer (s) for subscribing to investment research content and services provided by Lonsec.

Disclaimer: This document is for the exclusive use of the person to whom it is provided by Lonsec and must not be used or relied upon by any other person. No representation, warranty or undertaking is given or made in relation to the accuracy or completeness of the information presented in this document, which is drawn from public information not verified by Lonsec. Conclusions, ratings and advice are reasonably held at the time of completion but subject to change without notice. Lonsec assumes no obligation to update this document following publication. Except for any liability which cannot be excluded, Lonsec, its directors, officers, employees and agents disclaim all liability for any error, inaccuracy, misstatement or omission, or any loss suffered through relying on the information.

Copyright © 2019 Lonsec Research Pty Ltd, ABN 11 151 658 561, AFSL 421 445. All rights reserved. Read our Privacy Policy here.

In recent years valuations across most asset classes have been sitting in the expensive range. Strong tailwinds from central banks in the form of low interest rates and liquidity support via quantitative easing have largely been responsible for these stretched valuations, while markets have been further fuelled by both strength in the cycle as well as shorter-term positive sentiment.

However, we are currently witnessing a shift in market dynamics as central banks move away from quantitative easing and interest rates gradually move higher from their previous historic lows. Cyclical indicators such as production figures and the output gap are also tapering off and shorter-term sentiment has moved into negative territory. This has resulted in increased volatility in markets and some asset classes retreating from their previous highs.

At the end of 2017 emerging market equities was one of the best performing sectors in the market, with the index (MSCI Emerging Markets TR Index AUD) returning just over 27% for the year. Roll forward one year and the sector was one of the worst performing, with returns of -4.7% as at the end of 2018. The sector has suffered amid concerns of a Chinese slowdown, a strengthening US dollar and other idiosyncratic country-specific issues which have seen large flows out of the sector.

Despite the negative news from a valuation perspective, Lonsec’s proprietary internal rate of return (IRR) model is signalling that the emerging market equities sector is beginning to present value from an absolute as well as asset class relative basis. Our analysis indicates that the valuation support for the sector has continued and the sector now offers a significant premium above developed markets. While risks remain in the sector and the threat of a China slowdown continues to be a topic of debate, in our view the emerging markets sector offers an attractive return premium relative to developed markets, warranting an active tilt to the sector.

Responding to market movements with Dynamic Asset Allocation

Our Dynamic Asset Allocation approach means we can be flexible across asset classes and adjust asset allocation positions for the medium term to navigate market changes. We recently reflected our view of the emerging markets opportunities by making changes to our Multi-Asset and Listed Diversified Managed portfolios and increasing our exposure to the emerging markets sector ahead of developed markets.

Important information: Any express or implied rating or advice is limited to general advice, it doesn’t consider any personal needs, goals or objectives.  Before making any decision about financial products, consider whether it is personally appropriate for you in light of your personal circumstances. Obtain and consider the Product Disclosure Statement for each financial product and seek professional personal advice before making any decisions regarding a financial product.