Super funds have started the new financial year with some positive momentum but face a period of stark uncertainty as Australian cases of Covid-19 rise and Victoria enters harsher lockdown conditions.

While we have seen stabilisation in markets, they remain vulnerable to further shocks, while super fund performance is contingent on how communities and economies cope with further waves of infections.

According to estimates from leading superannuation research house SuperRatings, the median balanced option returned 0.9% in July as markets continued to rebuild following March’s falls. Overall, super funds have made it through in good shape but are preparing for more market ups and downs through the rest of the 2020 calendar year.

“The outlook is still unclear but based on recent performance super funds have shown they can weather the Covid-19 storm,” said SuperRatings Executive Director Kirby Rappell.

“Looking at SuperRatings’ balanced option index, the sector is 4.0% below where it was at the start of 2020. This is less than ideal for members, but thanks to the recovery we saw over the June quarter we have already made up a lot of ground. Hopefully this momentum can continue, and members can swiftly regain their super wealth.”

According to SuperRatings’ estimates, the median balanced option is down 1.2% over the 12 months to July. The median growth option is estimated to have fallen -1.7% while the median capital stable option is steady at 0.5%.

Accumulation returns to end of July 2020

  CYTD 1 yr 3 yrs (p.a.) 5 yrs (p.a.) 7 yrs (p.a.) 10 yrs (p.a)
SR50 Growth (77-90) Index -5.1% -1.7% 5.8% 5.9% 7.7% 7.8%
SR50 Balanced (60-76) Index -4.0% -1.2% 5.5% 5.3% 6.9% 7.4%
SR50 Capital Stable (20-40) Index -0.9% 0.5% 3.7% 3.8% 4.6% 5.1%

Source: SuperRatings estimates

Pension returns have performed more or less in line with accumulation returns over the past year. The median balanced pension option is estimated to have fallen 1.2% over the 12 months to July, compared to a drop of 1.9% from the median growth option and a modest rise of 0.5% from the median capital stable option.

Pension returns to end of July 2020

  CYTD 1 yr 3 yrs (p.a.) 5 yrs (p.a.) 7 yrs (p.a.) 10 yrs (p.a)
SRP50 Growth (77-90) Index -5.6% -1.9% 6.5% 6.7% 8.5% 8.7%
SRP50 Balanced (60-76) Index -4.1% -1.2% 6.0% 6.0% 7.5% 8.1%
SRP50 Capital Stable (20-40) Index -1.0% 0.5% 4.3% 4.3% 5.1% 5.8%

Source: SuperRatings estimates 

July’s results represent the fourth month in a row of positive returns for super, following the 9.2% drop members experienced in March. While the results are promising, there is still a way to go before members recoup their losses, and the Covid-19 situation in Australia remains precarious as other states brace for potential spikes in infections.

“We can certainly take heart from recent performance, but we should not underestimate the challenge that we still face,” said Mr Rappell.

“Markets are incredibly difficult to navigate at the moment. Globally, we are seeing a disconnect between the rise in share valuations and the weakness in economic data. Meanwhile, the low yield environment will only be exacerbated by governments issuing more debt to shore up budgets and continue providing support to those affected by the virus.”

Growth in $100,000 invested over 15 years to 30 July 2020

Source: SuperRatings estimates

Taking a long-term view, super returns have done an incredible job at accumulating wealth for retirees over a period that includes two major financial and economic crises. According to SuperRatings’ data, since July 2005, a starting balance of $100,000 would now be worth $235,877 for members in a balanced option. For a growth option this would be slightly higher at $236,235. A member with full exposure to Australian shares would have seen their balance growth to $254,188. In contrast, returns on cash would have seen the balance grow to only $157,939.

With central bankers around the world committing to keep interest rates low for many years to come, this creates an issue for retirees looking for income. Traditional defensive assets such as cash and fixed income which typically form a large percentage of retiree portfolios are producing levels of income significantly below historical averages.

In Australia, the RBA is keeping the 3-year yield for government bonds at 0.25%, in what is known as yield curve control. Interest rates have been suppressed for the last decade, however what is unique about the current economic climate, is that with inflation yet to emerge and central bankers focused on generating growth and employment, their signalling to the market has moved further out. Lower for much longer!

Thanks to Covid-19, investors face “lower for even longer” when it comes to yields. With interest rates at historic lows and around a third of ASX-listed companies having suspended, cancelled, or revised dividend payments, generating the same level of income that investors have enjoyed in the past is becoming ever more challenging.

In this environment it is understandable that investors might start to view yield as overrated, especially if they are seeing potential growth opportunities that are going begging. Aiming for total returns and drawing down on capital as needed might seem like a smarter way to fund your retirement. However, while a total return strategy is valid, it comes with risks that all retirement investors should be aware of. In fact, the Covid-19 situation is itself the perfect example of how a total return strategy can come unstuck.

Drawing down on capital to provide regular income might work when markets are rising and volatility is relatively low, but when a crisis hits, investors can end up sacrificing more capital than they desire. This can be detrimental to your client’s ability to regrow their capital following a period of sustained losses, making it more likely that they will fall short of their retirement funding needs. It may be harder to target yield in this environment, but you should not neglect it as core building block of your client’s portfolio.

Where to find income in a Covid-19 world

Generating income was already challenging before the Covid-19 outbreak. Now, with companies hit incredibly hard by lockdown measures and central banks embarking on unprecedented easing measures, it is more difficult than ever before.

Lonsec has analysed its own retirement portfolios and factored in a 30% cut to dividends across its entire equity and A-REIT book. Over the next 12 months, Lonsec expects that yield will fall well short of the long-term yield target of 4%, especially for lower risk profile portfolios. It expects yield to be maintained at this level in the long-run and to pick up once companies begin paying dividends again in the latter part of next year, but in the meantime it is going to be an uphill battle.

The question is how to target additional sources of income without materially adding to risks in the portfolio. The key here is diversification. Just as it is important to diversify across your growth assets, it is equally important to diversify sources of yield. Even within equities, there are many ways fund managers are able to gain exposure to different sources of income. In the fixed income space, this means looking beyond safe but relatively low-yielding government bonds to things like corporate credit and syndicated loans, where informed asset selection and prudent portfolio construction can deliver solid results.

This is where an active portfolio approach can make a big difference by giving investors the flexibility to take advantage of the opportunities that have arisen to source additional sources of income for multi-asset portfolios. Certain sources of credit and syndicated loans are something Lonsec looked at carefully as the Covid-19 crisis hit.

Leading up to the crisis, some areas of the credit market were looking overpriced, but recent market dislocation has thrown up some potential opportunities for close observers. In our conversations with fixed income fund managers, especially back in March when bond markets were all but locked up, one common theme was the emergence of value and the sudden appearance of opportunities that had not been seen in that area for many years.

Lonsec took advantage of this situation and made some key changes to its own retirement portfolios. It added the Bentham Syndicated Loans Fund, which is a sub-investment grade strategy that offers a higher yield than those with an investment grade focus, and the Ardea Real Outcome Fund, which offers a return source that is not dependent on duration or credit risk. Lonsec also increased its exposure to Talaria Global Equity, a strategy that sources much of its income from option premia and tends to benefit from these types of environments when volatility is elevated.

Yield should form a key building block of your retirement portfolio

Once again diversification and risk management are key, but an active portfolio approach can allow investors to pull a number of different levers to generate higher income returns without materially altering the risk characteristics of their portfolio. Targeting income is not always easy, and investors will still need to manage their expectations, but it can done, even in the current environment.

Falling back on a total return approach to generate your required income is possible, but it can leave investors exposed during a crisis. As the following section explains, it is worth getting the income component of your retirement portfolio right.

Sequencing risk is real, and not just for those transitioning to retirement

While market bumps are nothing to be feared for those building wealth, a sudden major event like the Covid-19 pandemic can spell disaster for those entering the decumulation phase. While we will inevitably experience losses, both in the leadup to and during retirement, the timing of losses can matter a great deal.

Sequencing risk refers to the order in which investors experience returns, and it can have a big impact on retirement outcomes. Making withdrawals during a falling market has the potential to accelerate the depletion of capital. This is why going for total returns can be risky, especially during the period we are in now, where there is heightened market volatility and a lot of uncertainty regarding a potential second wave of infections and further lockdown measures.

If your client’s portfolio is not structured appropriately, they could end up drawing down on their capital at a time when it is been heavily depleted by large market losses. This could leave them exposed to much greater sequencing risk than you they might have envisaged.

When capital returns are potentially high and yields are low, it is natural that investors will consider a total return approach to achieve their objectives. However, we should beware the risks. Capital growth is still a core objective, even for those in the retirement phase, but we should be careful how much capital we are prepared to sacrifice to meet out income needs. Inevitably, we may find ourselves getting by with less income that we hoped, but this is better than the alternative.

As soon as disaster strikes, and we face very subdued capital returns or even an extended bear market, that is when a well-structured portfolio delivers real value. That is why you should focus on growth, yield, and risk control as individual portfolio building blocks. We might need to be smarter about how we source our income, and more active and flexible in our approach, but it is worth it if we want to weather a crisis.

Issued by Lonsec Research Pty Ltd ABN 11 151 658 561 AFSL 421 445 (Lonsec). Warning: Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. Any advice is General Advice without considering the objectives, financial situation and needs of any person. Before making a decision read the PDS and consider your financial circumstances or seek personal advice. Disclaimer: Lonsec gives no warranty of accuracy or completeness of information in this document, which is compiled from information from public and third-party sources. Opinions are reasonably held by Lonsec at compilation. Lonsec assumes no obligation to update this document after publication. Except for liability which can’t be excluded, Lonsec, its directors, officers, employees and agents disclaim all liability for any error, inaccuracy, misstatement or omission, or any loss suffered through relying on the document or any information. ©2020 Lonsec. All rights reserved. This report may also contain third party material that is subject to copyright. To the extent that copyright subsists in a third party it remains with the original owner and permission may be required to reuse the material. Any unauthorised reproduction of this information is prohibited. 

When we think of the most important components of our portfolio, it is easy to overlook cash. Investors seeking to diversify their investments will typically keep a portion of their funds in cash or enhanced cash funds to ensure a readily available funding source for expenses or to allocate to other assets. Despite the importance cash plays in our portfolio, we tend not to focus heavily on the risks that enhanced cash funds can pose during periods of market stress.

As the Covid-19 pandemic rolls on, with further lockdowns and more stringent social distancing measures in some parts of the world, it is critical that we learn the lessons of the dislocation that hit credit markets in March. This means taking a close look at the risks inherent in enhanced cash products and how to mitigate them to create a more robust portfolio, especially during bouts of volatility.

As a relatively low risk, defensive asset, investors typically expect their cash to provide regular income and capital stability within their diversified portfolio. Some investors, in order to generate enhanced returns relative to cash funds, invest in enhanced cash products that carry greater risks that some investors may not always be fully aware of. These risks have come to light in recent months and emphasized the need to carefully manage the cash component of your portfolio.

Enhanced cash products in the past few months have been impacted by the Covid-19 health crisis, which has caused financial market volatility the magnitude of which was last seen during the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) in 2008-09. This volatility has caused the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) to reduce the official cash rate to a record low 0.25% and hold the yield curve out to three years in a range around the same level.

Record low interest rates have significantly reduced the income received by investors, and this problem has been further compounded by capital stability concerns as financial markets turmoil has seen the price of some cash assets fall and yields rise relative to the RBA cash rate. As a result, some enhanced cash funds in this record low yield environment surprised unit holders by producing negative absolute returns during the March quarter, while other enhanced cash funds continued to produce positive returns, albeit with relatively low yields.

This has served as a timely reminder that you need to look at not only the returns but also the risk characteristics of individual enhanced cash products. This is critical in order to understand the impact of financial market volatility on the risk of your cash holdings.

Enhanced cash funds are exposed to credit risk, term risk, and liquidity risk. These refer respectively to the risk of losing capital due to default by security issuers, the changes in interest rates that adversely affect the price of the securities, and the inability to convert the securities into cash without any loss of capital. Given these risk factors, the returns for enhanced cash are sourced from each of these risks accordingly (i.e. credit premium, term premium, and liquidity premium). Among all the premiums, credit premium is typically the main contributor of enhanced cash fund returns when compared to cash fund returns.

Enhanced cash products typically invest in high quality investment grade securities and cash accounts with an average credit rating of A+ or A1, where the probability of losing capital or suffering delayed payments is very limited. These investments may include overnight cash accounts, bank bills, promissory notes, asset-backed securities such as registered mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) and floating rate notes (FRNs) issued by semi-governments, and corporates, all of which are common constituents of enhanced cash strategies.

Of these securities, RMBS and FRNs are assets that are sensitive to price movements, which in the current Covid-19 situation are at risk of becoming stressed if credit and liquidity conditions deteriorate. As a result of stressed market conditions, some of these security prices are adjusted lower. Enhanced cash fund unit prices become materially impacted and those investors looking to redeem their funds may find the fund product’s sell spread has widened or redemption price has risen materially.

This sell spread change considers the increased trading costs during such a volatile period, which is passed on to the investor redeeming their funds, rather than impacting unit holders that remain in the fund.

These lower unit prices and increased transaction costs caught investors unawares in March and caused some enhanced cash funds to achieve short-term negative returns. A stressed liquidity and credit experience with enhanced cash funds also occurred during the GFC. The severity and duration of the GFC was different to the current crisis, and many enhanced cash funds recaptured their underperformance relative to cash funds following the GFC. The lesson is that the search for additional return beyond cash rates, which comes with increased risk, must be done cautiously.

On average, enhanced cash products usually have within the fund securities with a longer weighted average life or maturity than traditional cash funds. This longer maturity profile exposes enhanced cash funds to greater interest rate risks and therefore an expected higher term premium. When interest rates are falling, enhanced cash funds with their longer maturities benefit from the rise in securities prices and receive a capital gain greater than a cash fund. However, when interest rates are rising, enhanced cash funds are at a slight disadvantage because of this interest rate risk when compared to cash funds.

Overall, given current financial market conditions, it is important to take a closer look at enhanced cash funds and make prudent assessments based on the different risks they are exposed to. Compare the credit risks, maturity profile (also known as duration), and liquidity, both across individual enhanced cash products and compared to cash funds and understand the trade-off that is being made to achieve a higher return. It is important to critically assess these differences, especially during downside scenarios and periods of heightened uncertainty.

Issued by Lonsec Research Pty Ltd ABN 11 151 658 561 AFSL 421 445 (Lonsec). Warning: Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. Any advice is General Advice without considering the objectives, financial situation and needs of any person. Before making a decision read the PDS and consider your financial circumstances or seek personal advice. Disclaimer: Lonsec gives no warranty of accuracy or completeness of information in this document, which is compiled from information from public and third-party sources. Opinions are reasonably held by Lonsec at compilation. Lonsec assumes no obligation to update this document after publication. Except for liability which can’t be excluded, Lonsec, its directors, officers, employees and agents disclaim all liability for any error, inaccuracy, misstatement or omission, or any loss suffered through relying on the document or any information. ©2020 Lonsec. All rights reserved. This report may also contain third party material that is subject to copyright. To the extent that copyright subsists in a third party it remains with the original owner and permission may be required to reuse the material. Any unauthorised reproduction of this information is prohibited. 

The live webinar was held on Wednesday at 10 AM AEST, 15th of July, 2020

Overview

During our past webinar “Sustainability vs ESG: What is your client looking for?”, our platform was inundated with questions from attendees.

We weren’t able to respond to everyone, so by popular demand, we decided to hold a special Q&A event, so Lonsec could respond to the questions we received about the Sustainability and ESG process. 

Financial advisers are increasingly being asked to take their clients’ environmental, social and governance (ESG) expectations and ethical considerations into account when recommending financial products. Whilst the term ESG is becoming increasingly common, the objectives of fund managers and end investors don’t always align and can be a source of great confusion.

Darrell Clark, Manager, Multi-Asset, and Tony Adams, Head of Sustainable Investment Research at Lonsec delved deeper into the topic and responded to attendees’ burning questions!

 

If you attended our live webinar, please note that further instruction on how to receive the CPD Points will be delivered to your inbox in the next 8-12 business days. Whilst we aim to ensure every attendee receives CPD Points, it is within the guidelines provided that you are required to attend the full duration of the live webinar to receive your CE accreditation. Our technology platform collects data that reflects the duration and your full engagement during the live session.

CE/CPD accreditation is provided by our CE Accreditation Partner, Portfolio Construction Forum.


The content, presentations and discussion topics covered during this event are intended for licensed financial advisers and institutional clients only and are not intended for use by retail clients. No representation, warranty or undertaking is given or made in relation to the accuracy or completeness of the information presented.
Except for any liability which cannot be excluded, Lonsec, its directors, officers, employees and agents disclaim all liability for any error or inaccuracy in, misstatement or omission from, these presentations or any loss or damage suffered by the attendee or any other person as a consequence of relying upon the information presented.
Lonsec advises that all content presented at this event by any Symposium partner (not part of the Lonsec group of companies) is 3rd party content and forms representations and opinions of those 3rd parties alone. The contents of the presentations at this event are not in any way endorsed by Lonsec.

Investors have traditionally seen the largest 20 companies in the S&P/ASX 200 Index as the Australian champions that should form the backbone of an investment portfolio.

These names have become a staple for many investors if only because we don’t see a lot of rotation among them, even over relatively long periods of time. These companies have historically been banks, telcos, and even media conglomerates that sat at the centre of Australia’s news and entertainment industry.

In the Australian investing mindset, these companies are associated with industry leadership, proven business models, and high dividends. They are valued for the strength of their market position and the fact that they have been a feature of the corporate landscape for decades. Often, the longer investors hold these shares, the more reluctant they are to sell them.

However, given the market turmoil in the wake of COVID-19, investors are starting to ask themselves if they have become too reliant on these names. With companies forced to cut, delay, and even cancel dividends, the traditional view of blue-chip investing is starting to change.

Today, newcomers like Australian Healthcare giant CSL, major supermarkets in Woolworths and Coles, key Consumer Discretionary player Wesfarmers, and not to mention BHP are playing greater prominence within a balanced portfolio. While the banks still feature heavily, their dominance has dwindled post the GFC as regulation and lower interest rates limit their growth opportunities.

The role of large-cap shares in your portfolio

In Lonsec’s view, there is an important role for large-cap shares within a diversified portfolio. However, focusing too heavily on a handful of large companies and expecting them to do the heavy lifting can result in poor performance and likely will not be serving the investor’s needs and objectives.

The COVID-19 crisis has no doubt exposed a number of investors who believed they could rely on a company’s size and track record without considering their sources of risk or how exposed they were to certain sectors.

Diversification is critical when constructing a portfolio. This means having suitable exposures to different sectors, company sizes, and geographic regions. It also means understanding how your portfolio is positioned to manage various risks and opportunities as they emerge.

Heading into 2020, Lonsec’s portfolios were defensively positioned, with overweight exposures to the Health Care and Consumer Staples sectors. Following changes made in March, we increased our defensive exposure with companies we considered had a higher degree of earnings certainty, strong balance sheets, and a margin of safety that would help withstand the cashflow crunch.

At the other end of spectrum, the outlook for the Financials, Energy, and Consumer Discretionary sectors remains challenging, and Lonsec has remained underweight these sectors. Some companies like JB Hi-Fi and Harvey Norman reported surprisingly strong sales numbers, likely due to a switching of discretionary spend from food and leisure due to families being in ‘lockdown’, as such this is likely to be a short-term spike.

As short-term stimulus measures come to an end, these sectors may come under increasing pressure, and stock selection within these sectors will become critical.

Banking on the banks is not always wise

In terms of the banks, it’s very difficult to be positive. The Financials sector fell 20% over the first half of 2020, and while the banks are still generating a return on equity, the days of shareholders enjoying ROEs of around 15% are likely a thing of the past. Regulators have been working with the banks to help absorb the shock, but valuations remain low.

The key headwinds are the ultra-low interest rate environment, which has eaten into lending margins, and whilst mortgage deferrals have the potential to increase bank earnings (by inadvertently increasing their mortgage books), although the risk is that these actually turn into impairments. The banks may need monitor dividends or raise capital should this eventuate.

The financial services sector has underperformed the broader index


Source: Bloomberg

While ANZ and WBC looked to suspend their interim dividends, NAB cut their dividend by more than 50%, but sought to raise $3.5 billion from shareholders, which has been highly dilutive. Given APRA’s written guidance to the banks that they should be limiting discretionary dividend payments, boards are likely to be conservative with payout ratios until there’s further clarity. While the full impact is difficult to gauge at this time, the bottom line is that we should not expect the sort of dividends we have seen in the past, at least for the foreseeable future.

The effects of COVID-19 on the market has prompted investors to reconsider their understanding of blue-chip investing and the strategies that rely heavily on them. For many investors, expanding their horizon has helped put things in perspective. Asian markets are a good example of how dynamic things can be even at the high end of the market cap, which has seen the rise of different blue chips compared to Australia.

Asia certainly is showing strong growth in the tech sector, but the market is also benefiting from the rise of the middle class. When you look at the Financials and Consumer Discretionary sectors there, they have a higher EPS growth trajectory compared to Australia, simply because of those demographic factors that are driving earnings.

Looking further afield can also help investors identify a wider set of opportunities, even during the COVID-19 pandemic. Suddenly we’re working online, and many have been surprised at how seamlessly this happened. This has been facilitated by the rise in a host of digital services, which have allowed consumers and businesses to continue operating even during lockdown.

In Asia, the so-called fourth industrial revolution—new developments in automation, AI, and machine learning—combined with the demographic headwinds, is creating a lot of new growth potential. These could become the new blue-chip shares of the future, if they aren’t already. Alibaba and Baidu are prime examples of this. If Australian investors want to benefit from the growth in these companies, they need to expand their definition of blue-chip.

Including international blue chips in your portfolio is an important way of diversifying your risk and gaining exposure to different sources of growth. There are a range of products that help investors target these sectors, but the key is how these products are used within a broader risk-managed portfolio. Taking an active approach to managing these exposures is also key, especially given market dynamics can change incredibly quickly in the current environment.

Blue-chip shares have served Australians well, but the days of using the likes of BHP or Telstra to form the nucleus of an Australia-centric portfolio are over. If investors want to capture the new growth opportunities in world driven by technological change, while avoiding the potential dividend trap of traditional blue-chip shares, it’s time to start thinking differently.

Issued by Lonsec Research Pty Ltd ABN 11 151 658 561 AFSL 421 445 (Lonsec). Warning: Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. Any advice is General Advice without considering the objectives, financial situation and needs of any person. Before making a decision read the PDS and consider your financial circumstances or seek personal advice. Disclaimer: Lonsec gives no warranty of accuracy or completeness of information in this document, which is compiled from information from public and third-party sources. Opinions are reasonably held by Lonsec at compilation. Lonsec assumes no obligation to update this document after publication. Except for liability which can’t be excluded, Lonsec, its directors, officers, employees and agents disclaim all liability for any error, inaccuracy, misstatement or omission, or any loss suffered through relying on the document or any information. ©2020 Lonsec. All rights reserved. This report may also contain third party material that is subject to copyright. To the extent that copyright subsists in a third party it remains with the original owner and permission may be required to reuse the material. Any unauthorised reproduction of this information is prohibited. 

 

SuperRatings Executive Director Kirby Rappell shares the latest performance results for superannuation funds and the future outlook for the industry.

Members should be prepared for more ups and downs. However, a patient approach has paid off for members over the long term with the median balanced style fund returning 7.0% per annum since the introduction of superannuation in 1992.

 

 

 


Any advice that SuperRatings provides is of a general nature and does not take into account an individual’s financial situation, objectives or needs. Because the information that SuperRatings receives about superannuation and pension financial products is from a number of sources, it is not guaranteed to be completely accurate. Because of this, individuals should, before acting on the information, consider its appropriateness having regard to their own financial objectives, situation and needs and if appropriate, obtain personal financial advice on the matter from a financial adviser. Before making a decision regarding any financial product, individuals should obtain and consider a copy of the relevant Product Disclosure Statement from the financial product issue.

The live webinar was held on Wednesday at 10 AM AEST, 1st July, 2020

Overview

We were blown away by the response to the Lonsec Webinar Series, which saw over 3,000 people attend across five webinars. Unfortunately, given the range of topics and limited time available, we weren’t able to get to everyone’s questions. So for this webinar, we opened it up to the floor. Join our portfolio construction experts in an exciting panel discussion.

Moderator: Brook Sweeney, Senior Investment Consultant

Panel:

• Lukasz de Pourbaix – Chief Investment Officer
• Veronica Klaus – Head of Investment Consulting
• Dan Moradi – Portfolio Manager, Listed Products
• Deanne Baker – Portfolio Manager, Multi-Assets

 

If you attended our live webinar, please note that further instruction on how to receive the CPD Points will be delivered to your inbox in the next 5-10 business days. Whilst we aim to ensure every attendee receives CPD Points, it is within the guidelines provided that you are required to attend the full duration of the live webinar to receive your CE accreditation. Our technology platform collects data that reflects the duration and your full engagement during the live session.

 


The content, presentations and discussion topics covered during this event are intended for licensed financial advisers and institutional clients only and are not intended for use by retail clients. No representation, warranty or undertaking is given or made in relation to the accuracy or completeness of the information presented.
Except for any liability which cannot be excluded, Lonsec, its directors, officers, employees and agents disclaim all liability for any error or inaccuracy in, misstatement or omission from, these presentations or any loss or damage suffered by the attendee or any other person as a consequence of relying upon the information presented.

This information is provided by Lonsec Investment Solutions as a corporate authorised representative of Lonsec Research Pty Ltd who hold an AFSL number 421445. This is general advice, which doesn’t consider your personal circumstances. Consider these and always read the product disclosure statement or seek professional advice prior to making any decision about a financial product. You can access a copy of our financial services guide at lonsec.com.au

This video is provided by Lonsec Investment Solutions Pty Ltd ACN 608 837 583, a Corporate Authorised Representative (CAR 1236821) (LIS) of Lonsec Research Pty Ltd ABN 11 151 658 561 AFSL 421 445 (Lonsec Research). LIS creates the model portfolios it distributes using the investment research provided by Lonsec Research but LIS has not had any involvement in the investment research process for Lonsec Research. LIS and Lonsec Research are owned by Lonsec Holdings Pty Ltd ACN 151 235 406. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. This is general advice, which doesn’t consider your personal circumstances. Consider these and always read the product disclosure statement or seek professional advice prior to making any decision about a financial product. While care has been taken to prepare the content of this video, LIS makes no representation or warranty to the accuracy or completeness of the information presented, which is drawn from public information not verified by LIS. The information contained in this video is current as at the date of publication. Copyright © 2020 Lonsec Investment Solutions Pty Ltd ACN 608 837 583

In this episode of Market Narratives, Lonsec’s Chief Investment Officer, Lukasz de Pourbaix, tackles a range of controversial topics and their implications for portfolio construction.

Is this the new normal or merely the continuation of what have now become conventional policy responses? Is there wisdom in crowds, or is there persistent overvaluation in popular stocks like the FAANGs? Which parts of the market are beginning to appear attractive and how can you position your portfolio to take advantage of them? Tune in to find out.

Market Narratives is a podcast series produced by Investment Magazine that features unorthodox conversations with thought leaders influencing the world of fiduciary investors.

During our previous Asset Allocation Committee meeting we expressed a desire to further diversify our exposure to credit securities within our portfolios. This view was driven by the significant pull back in credit markets in March, which Lonsec believes provided an opportunity to enter certain parts of the credit market, such as syndicated loans, which were previously considered fully valued.

This view has since been implemented within Lonsec’s Multi-Asset and Retirement Managed Portfolios. The allocation further diversifies the portfolios away from duration risk (interest rate risk associated with government bonds), and diversifies the sources of income, most notably within the Retirement Managed Portfolios, which have been impacted by the deferral and reduction in company dividends within the equities component of the portfolios.

In our most recent Asset Allocation Committee we have not made any changes to the existing asset allocation settings. The previous move to neutralize our slightly underweight exposure to equities has benefited the portfolios as equity markets have continued to rise on the view that COVID-19 cases have peaked across many key economic regions, and that economies will begin reopening for business. At the same time, the market has reacted favourably to further fiscal stimulus packages announced in Europe and China.

The output from our asset allocation model has not changed materially since our previous meeting. Some notable changes, however, include the reduction in valuation opportunities within equities, given that share markets, most notably in the US, have recovered since their trough in March. Our valuation model indicates that most asset classes are trading at fair value, with the exception of government bonds, which continue to look expensive, and A-REITs, which look attractive on a relative basis.

Liquidity and policy remain favourable as central banks and governments continue to prop up economies via monetary and fiscal easing measures. Cyclical indicators reman weak, with most economic indicators such as unemployment figures and PMIs continuing to show weakness. Finally, risk indicators such as the VIX and MOVE indices continue to trend down. Indeed, the MOVE index, which measures implied volatility within bond markets, has returned to pre COVID-19 levels.

While markets have shown strength, risks remain. The impact of COVID-19 on company earnings remains unclear at this stage, while the market has been pricing in negative news, meaning any news regarding company earnings that is worse than expected will likely adversely impact markets. Geopolitical risks, while ever present, are in the spotlight again. Tensions between the US and China are elevated, and the path forward is unclear. This is against the backdrop of the upcoming US election in November and recent civil unrest within the US following the death of George Floyd at the hands of US police.

Finally, if we try to look ahead, one of the risks the market is not factoring in is inflation. While our view is that inflation is not a risk in the near term, possible structural shifts to the make up of economies on the back of COVID -19, specifically the potential decline in globalization, changes in supply chains, and the re-emergence of manufacturing industries in service-based dominated economies, may see prices of goods and service increase in the future.

In the shorter term, should we see the ‘V’-shaped economic recovery, the risk of inflation is a plausible scenario given the magnitude of stimulus we have seen in recent months. Within our portfolios, we do have exposure to assets that can offer some inflation protection, notably via infrastructure and gold exposures.

Important information: Any express or implied rating or advice is limited to general advice, it doesn’t consider any personal needs, goals or objectives.  Before making any decision about financial products, consider whether it is personally appropriate for you in light of your personal circumstances. Obtain and consider the Product Disclosure Statement for each financial product and seek professional personal advice before making any decisions regarding a financial product.