Tony Adams, Head of Sustainable Investment Research, Lonsec Research and Ratings
Fund managers are increasingly placing biodiversity squarely within their ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) policies. In today’s rapidly changing environmental landscape, the loss of biodiversity is not just an ecological concern—it poses significant financial risks that can affect investment performance and portfolio resilience. Recent data from the Lonsec universe underlines this trend, showing that the number of managers reporting a policy position on biodiversity has surged from 21 to 72 managers over the last year, out of a manager universe of approximately 300. Even more striking is that Lonsec’s internal rating of the strength of these policies has more than doubled, signalling a substantive enhancement in both the quantity and quality of biodiversity-related initiatives across the industry.
This upward trend reflects an industry-wide recognition that biodiversity loss is a systemic risk, one that requires integrated and proactive management strategies. For many fund managers, the initial steps involve acknowledging biodiversity risks within broader sustainability or climate change statements. However, a closer look at industry practices reveals a spectrum of approaches. Some managers have embedded biodiversity considerations into their comprehensive ESG frameworks, incorporating metrics such as natural capital, deforestation risk, and exposure to sensitive ecosystems. Others have taken a more targeted approach by developing dedicated biodiversity policies, toolkits, and roadmaps to guide their investment and engagement strategies.
A number of managers are actively engaging with global initiatives and frameworks aimed at promoting biodiversity conservation. For instance, participation in investor coalitions such as Nature Action 100 and adherence to emerging frameworks like the Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD) have become increasingly common. These initiatives help standardise reporting and foster collaboration, ensuring that biodiversity risks are identified, measured, and managed more effectively.
Despite this progress, the landscape remains varied. Many fund managers still mention biodiversity as an important risk factor in sustainability or ESG reports, yet they have not formalised these considerations into standalone policies with clear targets and metrics. Industry analyses highlight that while biodiversity is widely acknowledged within risk assessments and engagement strategies, its integration often occurs indirectly through climate policies or broader environmental frameworks. In some cases, the policy language is generic, with no specific commitments or structured approach to addressing biodiversity loss, underscoring the challenges of operationalising such a multifaceted issue.
The evolution of biodiversity policies among fund managers is driven by growing investor demand for robust ESG disclosures and increasing regulatory scrutiny. Improved Lonsec scores and a threefold increase in reported biodiversity positions suggest that the industry is moving toward a more systematic, transparent, and strategic approach to managing biodiversity risks. This shift not only reflects heightened environmental awareness but also represents a pragmatic effort to safeguard long-term portfolio performance amid escalating ecological challenges.
The momentum behind biodiversity in ESG policies signals a significant cultural and operational shift within the asset management industry. With a marked increase in both the number and strength of biodiversity policies, fund managers are demonstrating a deeper commitment to mitigating environmental risks and contributing to a more sustainable financial ecosystem. As this trend continues, the integration of biodiversity considerations into investment decision-making will likely become a critical determinant of both financial and environmental success.
Important Information: This article has been produced by Lonsec Research Pty Ltd ABN 11 151 658 561, AFSL No. 421445 (Lonsec). Generation Development Group Limited ABN 90 087 334 370 is the parent company of Lonsec Research.
Warning: The content presented in this article is for informational purposes only and is not a prospectus, product disclosure statement or any other form of disclosure document within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001. Any express or implied rating or advice presented in this article is limited to “general advice” (as defined in the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)), without taking into account the investors’ objectives, financial situation and needs. Prior to acting upon any information presented in this article, advisers must do their own investigation and analysis of the appropriateness of the information for their investor, having regard to their objectives, financial situation and needs.
Disclaimer: Lonsec Research have provided this article for exclusive use of its clients. It is not intended for use by a retail client or member of the public and should not be used or relied upon by any other person. No representation, warranty or undertaking is given or made in relation to the accuracy or completeness of the information presented in this article. Lonsec Research assumes no obligation to update this article following publication. Except for any liability which cannot be excluded, Lonsec Research, their directors, officers, employees and agents disclaim all liability for any error or inaccuracy in, misstatement or omission from, this article or any loss or damage suffered by the viewer or any other person as a consequence of relying upon it.
